What's on?
My own website is up!!! Check it out! www.maychook.com
Monday, November 29, 2010
Network assignment
iPirates© - the most versatile torrent tracker site
Sunday, November 21, 2010
P2P file sharing
The theme for the network assignment is Peer-to-Peer (P2P) file sharing and how this network acts as a powerful platform on the Internet in three aspects - data transfer, communication, and information - which are important services offered by the Internet. Therefore, I will be making the webpages mimicking ThePirateBay torrent site (data transfer), Wikipedia (information), and Facebook (communication). I will explore the issues regarding P2P file sharing in the webpages.
Since P2P file sharing is closely associated with copyright infringement and illegal downloading, the approach of the web design is "Copycat", which I will name the pages by parody-ing current popular media (songs, movies, etc).
Since P2P file sharing is closely associated with copyright infringement and illegal downloading, the approach of the web design is "Copycat", which I will name the pages by parody-ing current popular media (songs, movies, etc).
Friday, November 12, 2010
Small Change or Big Change?
Malcolm Gladwell's "Small Change" vs. Clay Shirky's "It Takes A Village To Find A Phone"
I think both articles are convincing and strong with their examples. I would like to point out that Shirky and Gladwell’s are discussing groups that exist for different reasons. Shirky’s story is about the stolen phone and Gladwell’s story isabout social activism; they work differently and apparently express different interests.
I agree with Gladwell that social/political change needs to be done physically instead of ONLY spreading the message online. Since online groups are easy to join, they are easy to leave as well. If I join a group on Facebook, I do not have the obligation to be loyal to that group and I can leave the group any time. However, if I really care about an issue, I will take practical action to join the group physically and attend the meeting/protest.
When it comes to a less-serious issue like the stolen phone incident, online groups work well but it also has a limitation - the issue needs to be “fresh” enough to catch attention of the netizens. If this incident happens today, I don’t think many people would pay that much of attention. Most netizens expect contents on the Internet to be entertaining or attention catching; or else one can just close the browser window or check out about something else. Like what I said before, the information is easy to get, therefore it is easy to be navigated away as well.
I think both articles are convincing and strong with their examples. I would like to point out that Shirky and Gladwell’s are discussing groups that exist for different reasons. Shirky’s story is about the stolen phone and Gladwell’s story isabout social activism; they work differently and apparently express different interests.
I agree with Gladwell that social/political change needs to be done physically instead of ONLY spreading the message online. Since online groups are easy to join, they are easy to leave as well. If I join a group on Facebook, I do not have the obligation to be loyal to that group and I can leave the group any time. However, if I really care about an issue, I will take practical action to join the group physically and attend the meeting/protest.
When it comes to a less-serious issue like the stolen phone incident, online groups work well but it also has a limitation - the issue needs to be “fresh” enough to catch attention of the netizens. If this incident happens today, I don’t think many people would pay that much of attention. Most netizens expect contents on the Internet to be entertaining or attention catching; or else one can just close the browser window or check out about something else. Like what I said before, the information is easy to get, therefore it is easy to be navigated away as well.
Monday, November 1, 2010
HTML mini assignment
Sunday, October 31, 2010
The Yes Men
I missed the lecture and lab last week, so I hope what I say in this post is going to be relevant.
In my opinion, what The Yes Men did is pretty cool. Their professionally-made prank website - targeting Chevron recent campaign "We Agree"- can really trick people; but if you click on their main page link "The Yes Men" at the bottom, you will be led to their main website describing their objectives and reasons playing prank on particular corporations.
Let talk about what I thought BEFORE I checked out their objectives (I wrote down my thoughts, so the level of bias will be the minimum). What did I think when I first saw the two "We Agree" websites? Personally I like the messages in the prank website - they are simple, straight to the point, and I believe, representing most of the people's thoughts.
On The Yes Men's website, they claimed that "Impersonating big-time criminals in order to publicly humiliate them. Our targets are leaders and big corporations who put profits ahead of everything else." I agree that corporations and politicians should be attacked by some intellectuals in order to raise society awareness, allow freedom of speech, allow improvement and development, and so on. No one is perfect, and someone (in this case The Yes Men) has to remind them (in this case Chevron) to improve and do something for the consumers and people's sake.
While what stroke my mind was - why weren't The Yes Men sued by corporations which they put prank on? Perhaps lawsuits were made but the Chevron seems not taking this issue seriously (at least in my opinion). I was trying to look for some press releases or public statements made by Chevron regarding the issue, but I failed. Doesn't Chevron mind when they were being fooled? Or could anyone find me a statement released by Chevron addressing this issue?
The Yes Men know what they are doing. Their FAQ page on their website is very sufficient in information and they are confident with their stand. If they are sued due to copyright and prank issue, I would love to know what both sides could say.
In my opinion, what The Yes Men did is pretty cool. Their professionally-made prank website - targeting Chevron recent campaign "We Agree"- can really trick people; but if you click on their main page link "The Yes Men" at the bottom, you will be led to their main website describing their objectives and reasons playing prank on particular corporations.
Let talk about what I thought BEFORE I checked out their objectives (I wrote down my thoughts, so the level of bias will be the minimum). What did I think when I first saw the two "We Agree" websites? Personally I like the messages in the prank website - they are simple, straight to the point, and I believe, representing most of the people's thoughts.
On The Yes Men's website, they claimed that "Impersonating big-time criminals in order to publicly humiliate them. Our targets are leaders and big corporations who put profits ahead of everything else." I agree that corporations and politicians should be attacked by some intellectuals in order to raise society awareness, allow freedom of speech, allow improvement and development, and so on. No one is perfect, and someone (in this case The Yes Men) has to remind them (in this case Chevron) to improve and do something for the consumers and people's sake.
While what stroke my mind was - why weren't The Yes Men sued by corporations which they put prank on? Perhaps lawsuits were made but the Chevron seems not taking this issue seriously (at least in my opinion). I was trying to look for some press releases or public statements made by Chevron regarding the issue, but I failed. Doesn't Chevron mind when they were being fooled? Or could anyone find me a statement released by Chevron addressing this issue?
The Yes Men know what they are doing. Their FAQ page on their website is very sufficient in information and they are confident with their stand. If they are sued due to copyright and prank issue, I would love to know what both sides could say.
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Reading discussion -"Creators"
I agree with most of the points stated by Lessig. Sometimes it is really hard to draw a line to determine what ideas are free and what are not. Everything comes from borrowing from other people; so we are actually copying each other in some ways.
In current society, people can easily enquire about the notion of intellectual property and the laws protecting it. However, due to the power of media technology, this also means an idea can be exposed to more people, which can lead to more people borrowing the idea with and without intentions.
When the idea is getting popular by being borrowed by other people, I would say it helps the publicity of the idea and the original creator - like Lessig asking this rhetoric question, "Does piracy here hurt the victims of the piracy, or does it help them?"
Written copyright law is a lengthy document to read, but it definitely has something which is not well explained; especially when there are differences between the laws in various countries.
Globalization is a positive phenomenon, notably for artists. It allows us more opportunities to be inspired and share ideas with people. Sharing is caring, isn't it? Of course original creators should be protected and paid reasonably, but stealing and sharing are two different things.
Reading source:
Lessig, Lawrence. "Creators." Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. p.21-30. Soft copy from CreativeCommons.org. New York: The Penguin Press, 2004
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Remix - Music is what stories sound like
As commonly known, music is what feelings sound like; and most of the time people associate music with emotions instead of detailed stories. As a music major, my idea in this project is "music is what stories sound like", I remixed the images of people's faces and figures on the piano keys. One same pitch can tell thousands of stories.

(I am really bad in Photoshop; please watch the videos to keep your interest going.)
In addition to the still image, I made two videos for this project. I chose only music videos and remixed them become movie trailers. Singers and videos that promote music are still there, but new stories are created. Ignore the words at the bottom since they are lyrics in the original music videos.
Addressing the idea of music telling thousands of stories, I created totally different genres for the movie trailers - one is erotic/romance film; while another one is an action thriller. Through the remix, the singers and original songs/music videos appear differently in movies. The balance blend between my idea and the final products is the challenging part; and I tried to achieve it.
"The Love Circle" trailer is pretty straightforward with the captions; but I think I should update this post with the details of "The Lawbreaker". There are only 2 leading characters (Jay and Jolin, the singers in the original music videos) and 1 supporting character (a female - Zhou Xun) who first appears on 0:54. Both Jay (a secret agent) and Jolin (an assassin) are hired by a legal agency (yes a legal agency can do unlawful things secretly - politics) to conduct missions, but they don't know each other.
One day they are given a mission to hunt each other, which in fact the agency is using them for a self-benefit reason which can endanger the society as well. Jay and Jolin have OBLIGATION to fulfill their mission but later they figured out their boss' real intention. Zhou Xun who supposed to help Jay is actually stealing information from him. Therefore I use the word "TRUST" in the trailer right before the scene of Zhou Xun stealing information from Jay's computer.
Then the caption "Betrayal is a virtue, when truth unfolds" appears in the trailer to explain that Jay and Jolin betray their agency when they know the truth. In order to save their own lives and stop their agency from doing "legally unlawful" things, they work together and rebel their agency (you can see the bag throwing act on 1:15). So there is the movie title "The Lawbreaker". I keep it in singular to address the distinction between the two characters, since they should be enemies in the story.
I understand that the images switch pretty fast therefore viewers cannot catch everything in first watching; that is fairly normal for action movie trailers.
Sources for still image:
Piano keys
innocent-looking girl
hugging kids
kissing couple
poor kid
friends
holding hands
wounded man
smiling kid<
beaten kids
father and son
teacher
crying woman
couple hugging
old woman
Sources for video #1 "The Love Circle"
BIGBANG "Beautiful Hangover"
BIGBANG "My Heaven"
BIGBANG "Tell Me Goodbye"
Penny Tai "Lafite"
Yoga Lim "眼色" (Yan Se - Eye Signal)
Song used: Tokio Hotel "Rescue Me"
Sources for video #2 "The Lawbreaker"
Jolin Tsai "Agent J" music movie
Jay Chou's music videos:
"以父之名" (Yi Fu Zhi Ming - In the name of Father)
"四面楚歌" (Si Mian Chu Ge - Attacked from all Sides)
"夜的第七章" (Ye De Di Qi Zhang - Twilight's Seventh Chapter)
"你听得到" (Ni Ting De Dao - You Can Hear It)
"她的睫毛" (Ta De Jie Mao - Her Eyelashes)
Theme music - edited version of "Midnight Run" from Korean drama "IRIS" original soundtrack.
(I have clear version of sources for video #2; Youtube links provided are only for reference.)

(I am really bad in Photoshop; please watch the videos to keep your interest going.)
In addition to the still image, I made two videos for this project. I chose only music videos and remixed them become movie trailers. Singers and videos that promote music are still there, but new stories are created. Ignore the words at the bottom since they are lyrics in the original music videos.
Remix #1 "The Love Circle" movie trailer from May Chook on Vimeo.
Addressing the idea of music telling thousands of stories, I created totally different genres for the movie trailers - one is erotic/romance film; while another one is an action thriller. Through the remix, the singers and original songs/music videos appear differently in movies. The balance blend between my idea and the final products is the challenging part; and I tried to achieve it.
"The Love Circle" trailer is pretty straightforward with the captions; but I think I should update this post with the details of "The Lawbreaker". There are only 2 leading characters (Jay and Jolin, the singers in the original music videos) and 1 supporting character (a female - Zhou Xun) who first appears on 0:54. Both Jay (a secret agent) and Jolin (an assassin) are hired by a legal agency (yes a legal agency can do unlawful things secretly - politics) to conduct missions, but they don't know each other.
One day they are given a mission to hunt each other, which in fact the agency is using them for a self-benefit reason which can endanger the society as well. Jay and Jolin have OBLIGATION to fulfill their mission but later they figured out their boss' real intention. Zhou Xun who supposed to help Jay is actually stealing information from him. Therefore I use the word "TRUST" in the trailer right before the scene of Zhou Xun stealing information from Jay's computer.
Then the caption "Betrayal is a virtue, when truth unfolds" appears in the trailer to explain that Jay and Jolin betray their agency when they know the truth. In order to save their own lives and stop their agency from doing "legally unlawful" things, they work together and rebel their agency (you can see the bag throwing act on 1:15). So there is the movie title "The Lawbreaker". I keep it in singular to address the distinction between the two characters, since they should be enemies in the story.
I understand that the images switch pretty fast therefore viewers cannot catch everything in first watching; that is fairly normal for action movie trailers.
Sources for still image:
Piano keys
innocent-looking girl
hugging kids
kissing couple
poor kid
friends
holding hands
wounded man
smiling kid<
beaten kids
father and son
teacher
crying woman
couple hugging
old woman
Sources for video #1 "The Love Circle"
BIGBANG "Beautiful Hangover"
BIGBANG "My Heaven"
BIGBANG "Tell Me Goodbye"
Penny Tai "Lafite"
Yoga Lim "眼色" (Yan Se - Eye Signal)
Song used: Tokio Hotel "Rescue Me"
Sources for video #2 "The Lawbreaker"
Jolin Tsai "Agent J" music movie
Jay Chou's music videos:
"以父之名" (Yi Fu Zhi Ming - In the name of Father)
"四面楚歌" (Si Mian Chu Ge - Attacked from all Sides)
"夜的第七章" (Ye De Di Qi Zhang - Twilight's Seventh Chapter)
"你听得到" (Ni Ting De Dao - You Can Hear It)
"她的睫毛" (Ta De Jie Mao - Her Eyelashes)
Theme music - edited version of "Midnight Run" from Korean drama "IRIS" original soundtrack.
(I have clear version of sources for video #2; Youtube links provided are only for reference.)
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Nuit Blanche~~
Octobr 2nd was Nuit Blanche in Toronto, it was a sleepless night indeed for me, when I walked almost the whole downtown for the whole night.
There were two art works which I was fascinating with. _scape with 6 and 7 by Annie Onyi Cheung is a video installation with multi-channel sound. Taking place in Cloud Gardens which is an open space and sounding really scary (why were people scared?) , the sound is actually amplified sound of human breathing. And the video, which looks like a desert, is human chest rising and falling while breathing.
Breathing seems to be the most normal thing for us to do, but we never expected to hear and see it in such a way; while this artwork really opened my mind.
On the other hand, Endgame by Max Streicher caught my attention before I looked at it carefully. There are two huge clown balloons stuck on the back alley between two buildings. The clowns - supposed to be entertaining - look depressed and as if they have so much to say but they can only smile and make people happy.
Personally, I prefer artworks which took place in the public and open space, because they could provide people different ways to see a familiar place.
There were two art works which I was fascinating with. _scape with 6 and 7 by Annie Onyi Cheung is a video installation with multi-channel sound. Taking place in Cloud Gardens which is an open space and sounding really scary (why were people scared?) , the sound is actually amplified sound of human breathing. And the video, which looks like a desert, is human chest rising and falling while breathing.
Breathing seems to be the most normal thing for us to do, but we never expected to hear and see it in such a way; while this artwork really opened my mind.
On the other hand, Endgame by Max Streicher caught my attention before I looked at it carefully. There are two huge clown balloons stuck on the back alley between two buildings. The clowns - supposed to be entertaining - look depressed and as if they have so much to say but they can only smile and make people happy.
Personally, I prefer artworks which took place in the public and open space, because they could provide people different ways to see a familiar place.
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Notion of Home
To get some ideas for the remix project, I have been looking for something that I am familiar with. As a Malaysian international student, I came out some ideas about studying abroad, issues of migration, and some issues related to my country.
"Home" - this might be the central idea of my project.
Because I do not like to address much political issues, I would focus more on the sentiments of the notion of home.
Short film "Chocolate" is so thought-provoking - it started with addressing very-sensitive political issues in my country - and ends with a sense of bittersweetness. It was directed by the late Yasmin Ahmad (1958-2009), who was one of the influential filmmakers in Malaysia.
Chinese Malaysians have better education opportunities in other countries (admission and scholarship), but we do not hate the Malays who are well financially-supported by the government. The boy wants to run out from the store to give the chocolate to the girl, but he just realized there are so much boundaries between them. Who created the boundaries? Many people, but not everyone.
In addition to "Chocolate", "House" directed by Linus Chung under the same short-film project also gave me some ideas about home.
Big house or small house, it does not matter.
Other than these short films, I would like to share a post written by the late Yasmin Ahmad-
"Artists today think of everything they do as a work of art. It is important to forget about what you are doing - then a work of art may happen."
Cheers to art, cheers to life.
"Home" - this might be the central idea of my project.
Because I do not like to address much political issues, I would focus more on the sentiments of the notion of home.
Short film "Chocolate" is so thought-provoking - it started with addressing very-sensitive political issues in my country - and ends with a sense of bittersweetness. It was directed by the late Yasmin Ahmad (1958-2009), who was one of the influential filmmakers in Malaysia.
Chinese Malaysians have better education opportunities in other countries (admission and scholarship), but we do not hate the Malays who are well financially-supported by the government. The boy wants to run out from the store to give the chocolate to the girl, but he just realized there are so much boundaries between them. Who created the boundaries? Many people, but not everyone.
In addition to "Chocolate", "House" directed by Linus Chung under the same short-film project also gave me some ideas about home.
Big house or small house, it does not matter.
Other than these short films, I would like to share a post written by the late Yasmin Ahmad-
"Artists today think of everything they do as a work of art. It is important to forget about what you are doing - then a work of art may happen."
Cheers to art, cheers to life.
Monday, September 20, 2010
Connected
I read the article on a browser; honestly, how I wish I could have printed it out. Then I can read it on the bus while I am going home.
Possibilities are everywhere, there is no exception to the ever-evolving new technology. Is the Web dead? Who cares if it is really the case? I am pretty sure that a technology will have its replacement when it is to be eliminated. The corporations earn so much money in the industry, therefore they would not stop making new things to make people happy to spend their money. But the terms "new" and "happy" are subjective and vague, that is why critics can never finish their work.
In my opinion, applications - like Facebook, instant messenger, Google map etc. - extend what the internet can do (or we can say that the internet allows the extensions). They are mostly social networking sites or to connect people more with the world. However, how much is more? How much is too much? Does the connection work well? We already have cellphones on all the time (most people do), do we really need to connect to the world through a virtual space?
It depends on how the person uses it. To me, I do not want to connect to the internet all the time. I still need space to read printed media and see the world with my own eyes. As a musician, I hate distraction. When I am doing practice or composition, I switch my cellphone off; if someone knocks on my room door - without noticing the "Do not disturb" sign - I would be really annoyed. But, is this a kind of isolation? No, I do not think so. It is focus. then I would come back to real life, unlock my door and talk to my housemates.
Intimacy with the world comes by stepping away from new technology gadgets. We can actually see and listen (and FEEL) so much without clicking a button at all. We participate so much on online applications; however, based on the similar idea of participation, we can be so connected by just walking or sitting in a park, just like how we scroll a Facebook page and sitting in front of a computer the whole day. The former sounds more fun. If we can add strangers as friends on Facebook, we can also make friends with strangers in a park.
I have two laptops in my room and a cellphone with unlimited web browsing plan. But I still prefer to be in the "real" world, because the virtual ones are just small puzzles in this universe.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Believe
I am quite stupid when it comes to visual creativity. However, writing, singing, and the piano strings know me pretty well. The courage to believe in myself might be lost sometimes, but I feel blessed to be able to write and sing.
Labels:
facs2930,
mini assignment,
photoshop,
remix,
visual arts
Gabriel Orozco - an artist of his own life
Visual arts were a foreign language to me until I took the course FACS 1900 Arts and Ideas taught by Professor Robert Gill two years ago. Striving to be a songwriter, I understand the importance of connections between various artistic disciplines. While in Arts and Ideas, I got to know this incredible artist - Gabriel Orozco.
Orozco said he does not have a fixed studio; he works anywhere as long as he feels comfortable. He loves walking and taking pictures of anything simple or sophisticated. While taking pictures of candid nature, he might change the setting by rearranging the items and background - trying to create an "unnatural" yet thought provoking scene. In this sense, he is like a photographer in a studio, but he just improvises anything while he is walking on a street taking pictures. The process of walking, seeing, modifying, and taking pictures becomes so intimate to the artist himself, and also to us as viewers.
Orozco said he does not have a fixed studio; he works anywhere as long as he feels comfortable. He loves walking and taking pictures of anything simple or sophisticated. While taking pictures of candid nature, he might change the setting by rearranging the items and background - trying to create an "unnatural" yet thought provoking scene. In this sense, he is like a photographer in a studio, but he just improvises anything while he is walking on a street taking pictures. The process of walking, seeing, modifying, and taking pictures becomes so intimate to the artist himself, and also to us as viewers.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
